home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Turnbull China Bikeride / Turnbull China Bikeride - Disc 2.iso / BARNET / ARMLINUX / MAIL / 9707 / 000060_owner-linux-arm…r.rutgers.edu _Mon Jul 21 18:59:40 1997.msg < prev    next >
Internet Message Format  |  1997-11-30  |  2KB
  1. Return-Path: <owner-linux-arm-outgoing@vger.rutgers.edu>
  2. Received: from nic.funet.fi (nic.funet.fi [128.214.248.6]) by odie.barnet.ac.uk (8.8.2/8.8.0) with ESMTP id SAA13656 for <willy@odie.fluff.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 18:59:38 +0100
  3. Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2] EHLO vger.rutgers.edu ident: root [port 47986]) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id <15640-19387>; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 20:29:30 +0300
  4. Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <971083-8840>; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 13:25:44 -0400
  5. Received: from sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk ([128.86.8.50] EHLO sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 2240]) by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id <971093-8840>; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 13:23:50 -0400
  6. Received: from bright.ecs.soton.ac.uk by sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with JANET SMTP (PP); Mon, 21 Jul 1997 18:18:59 +0100
  7. Received: from  by bright.ecs.soton.ac.uk; Mon, 21 Jul 97 18:21:06 BST
  8. Received: from raistlin.armlinux.org by caramon.armlinux.org; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 21:00:54 GMT
  9. From: rmk@ecs.soton.ac.uk
  10. Message-Id: <3287.199707202100@raistlin.armlinux.org>
  11. Subject: Re: A5K Linux
  12. To: glyn@compsoc.man.ac.uk (Glyn Davies)
  13. Date:     Sun, 20 Jul 1997 22:00:18 +0100 (BST)
  14. Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
  15. In-Reply-To: <199707201449.PAA07868@mrbounce.compsoc.man.ac.uk> from "Glyn Davies" at Jul 20, 97 03:49:03 pm
  16. X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
  17. Mime-Version: 1.0
  18. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
  19. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
  20. X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
  21. Sender: owner-linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
  22. Precedence: bulk
  23. Status: RO
  24.  
  25. Glyn Davies writes:
  26. > I just tried building up gcc & binutils for compiling the kernel under i386,
  27. > Linux - but the patches didn't seem to be taking hold properly. ..
  28.  
  29. I hope that you're not trying to apply every single patch.
  30.  
  31. The patches are designed to be applied to clean 2.0.30 kernel, and only
  32. one patch is necessary.  I'm not doing incremental patches at the moment.
  33.    _____
  34.   |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
  35.   |   |       Russell King      rmk92@ecs.soton.ac.uk         --- ---
  36.   | | | | http://whirligig.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~rmk92/home.html  /  /  |
  37.   | +-+-+                                                     --- -+-
  38.   /   |               THE developer of ARM Linux              |+| /|\
  39.  /  | | |      *  who wishes that he was in Hong Kong  *      ---  |
  40.     +-+-+ -------------------------------------------------  /\\\  |